This content is for members only.
To register, click here.
This content is for members only.
To register, click here.
As my wife and I busily prepare our luggage for this weekend’s trip to the Walt Disney World Resort in (rainy) Orlando, Florida I thought it was only fitting that I put together some very NSFW photos of Jack Yount’s Disney tattoos for archival here at Sacred Debris.
Jack’s quaint little house in Zephyrhills was filled with paintings and statues- mostly homoerotic subject matter but with a noticeable presence of Disneyana; he was a great fan of Mickey Mouse and the Disney animated films and in the early 1990s began a full leg tattoo of iconic Disney moments by Ancient Art’s Just Plain Bud Pierson. The tattoos were a whimsical contrast to Jack’s other more shocking body modifications; the placement of Timothy Mouse 1 shrieking in horror at the sight of his subincised penis was intentionally tongue in cheek.
Jack was very encouraging when I decided on a Disney-themed tattoo for my own back-piece (pictured above at Scarwars2 in LA) by Inksmith & Roger’s Mike Wilson.
The photos include Disney tattoos by Bud, Jack’s pieced, split and silicone enhanced penis and R.S.- the owner of the infamous removed split penis that ended up in a jelly jar.
[KGVID width=”640″ height=”360″]http://sacreddebris.com/wp-content/uploads/VIDEO/jackyountsacreddebris.flv[/KGVID]
This one features Jack- in a rare PG rated appearance, talking about Pauline Clarke’s newly launched Piercing World Magazine, the current issue of PFIQ and a funny conversation with some South Florida auto-mechanics. ~ Jack Yount, Piercing World & PFIQ
In the five years I knew him, almost every conversation I had with Jack Yount ended with him dropping his drawers. It didn’t really matter what he was talking about or even who he was talking to- at some point the pants would come down and he’d take you on a tour of his latest tattoo work or modification project. It never seemed strange or inappropriate; if anything wearing pants seems like a hinderance and inconvenience and when he finally got to take them off he was much more at ease. That’s how I like to remember Jack; big smile and no pants.
When I originally posted this clip back in 2014 I cut it down to a safe for work edit; so consider this the ‘R-rated director’s cut’ of Jack’s show & tell with Sailor Sid. There were no notations on the VHS master, but I’m assuming this was filmed sometime in the late 1980s at Sid’s South Florida Silver Anchor Tattoo Studio.
I’ve been collating pictures of the Disney tattoos my friend and mentor Jack Yount had tattooed on him for a future post; like myself Jack was a huge fan of the ‘house of the mouse’ and chose to have a full leg tattoo of classic Disney characters by Ancient Art’s (Orlando) Bud Pierson, who was also responsible for the stomach and right leg aquatic tattoos.
For some reason this photo, which for for the most part doesn’t feature any Disneyana (save for a peek of Pinnochio, Goofy and a little of Ariel’s hair) caught my eye so it’s presented here, solo, while I finish compiling the rest of the photos and put them in the to-be-scanned queue.
Jack’s penis, by this point, was heavily injected with silicone from famed Modification Doctor Ronald Brown.
Client: Jack Yount
Subincision self done
Perineum tattoo Sailor Sid
Scrotum amputation Dr. Ronald Brown
Urethral re-route: Dr. Ronald Brown
Stomach tattooing: Bud Pierson
Year: 1994 (March)
Location: Zephyrhills, Fla
Due to complications with the teflon coating on one of the stainless steel balls implanted in Jack Yount’s scrotum (he had been castrated and had his testicles replaced with steel) he suffered an infection that turned gangrenous necessitating the amputation of his scrotum. The scar that starts just above his flame tattoo and runs up his shaft is the healed results of the amputation.
His penis had been subincised and his glans split/pierced and the hole that’s visible in the center of the flame tattoo was where his urethra was rerouted to via surgery. His justification for the urethral relocation was difficulty in urinating due to the increase in penis size from silicone injections, but his later experimentation with growing breasts via HRT (and injected silicone) opens up the possibility of different reasons for the opening; Jack kept some of his modifications shrouded in mystery.
When it comes to adding video content here on the SD blog I usually go for no frills; present the information without much flair with the goal of preserving the footage on older unstable formats like 8mm and VHS and archiving it for future generations. But sometimes there are parts that need trimmed or blurred that can’t just be removed from the finished video and I’ve sort of hit my wall with what I can do in iMovie.
So while you folks are hopefully doing something more fun, I’m reading the Final Cut Pro X Cookbook by a gentleman named Cox. Cox’s Final Cut could inspire so many juvenile jokes given the focus of our site but I’m going to take the high road and refrain.
The video that’s in editing is a ‘show & tell’ with one of Dr. Brown’s more extreme silicone clients. While most of the men who came to Brown for the procedure wanted just a little enhancement, some wanted to dramatically distort their genitals to an excessive degree, which the Doctor was happy to accommodate. The silicone could only be injected into certain types of tissue, which left the glans of the penis a ‘normal’ size in comparison to the penis and scrotum mass.
Injecting silicone into the body is extremely dangerous. I’m presenting this material for the sake of documentation and am not able to recommend any practitioners willing to perform this modification.
On ethical responsibility.
While I’m still not certain how to progress with video content on the site, I still edit captured footage for archival several times a week. I’ve always consciously shied away from posting any of the ModCon footage for several reasons- firstly because I truly believe that ModCon existed only for attendees and that our shared experience should have never been released outside of the group, but also because the content I have is straight up procedural footage. I was against the VCDs and DVDs circulating during their original release but I’m at least comforted by the fact that not many are floating around these days and as such they’ll never be used as a how-to guide for the next Instagram superstar. But what about other content?
As I was working on an archival project today I was becoming excited to share it with Sacred Debris readers. Edited together content from several silicone enhancement procedures (scrotum and penis) with an amazing monologue from Dr. Ronald Brown about his background and how he came to be the famed/reviled Modification Doctor and World’s Worst Surgeon.
It’s great stuff, especially Brown’s truly genuine concern for clients who’s needs fell outside of the medical status quo, particularly those who were seeking SRS.
But it’s also an up close look at the mechanics of silicone injection on a professional level.* In the year that we’ve been online, searches for some variation of silicone injection have accounted for 10k+ visitors, so there’s clearly a market for the procedure and very few people performing it.
Those who do offer it are often worse that Dr. Brown; peddling their services to anyone who can afford it and using non-biocompatible materials like mineral oil and even cement. Most of these butchers are working in the transgender community and not on modification fans looking for the kind of work shown in the video, but technique is technique and this would be Silicone 101 for folks looking for an instruction manual.
I’ve wrestled with this before- where does my ethical obligation lie when it comes to putting this sort of content online? Would I feel differently if it were a subincision procedure? Scarification? An implant? Obviously I think there’s room for a sliding scale of good idea/bad idea but where should the line be drawn?
I love posting the before & after interviews with the clients who’ve had these procedures done, but I’m just not sure that anything would be served with this kind of content being included here on the blog. Behind a walled garden like /extreme over at BMEZINE, maybe, but certainly not here.
What do you folks think?
I know we don’t get a lot of comments here, but if you have thoughts on this, let me know. And defend your position; if you’re a piercer who feels that it’s ok to show procedurals, would you film a piercing start to finish for the Web?
These are the things I think about at 4am.
*One could argue that, with the dangers associated with silicone enhancement there IS no professional level.